Translate

Tuesday 7 October 2014

Ebola now in Spain!!!!

A Spanish nurse who treated an Ebola victim in Madrid has contracted the virus herself in the first case of contagion outside Africa, health officials say.
The nurse tested positive for Ebola in two separate tests, according to reports.
She was part of the team that treated Spanish priest Manuel Garcia Viejo, who died of Ebola on September 25.
Some 3,400 people have died in the outbreak – mostly in West Africa. The priest died in the hospital Carlos III de Madrid after catching Ebola in Sierra Leone.
Another Spanish priest, Miguel Pajares, died in August after contracting the virus in Liberia. The nurse was admitted to hospital on Monday morning with a high fever, Spanish newspaper El Pais said.
Doctors isolated the emergency treatment room, the report said.
Ebola spreads through contact with the bodily fluids of someone who has the virus and the only way to stop an outbreak is to isolate those who are infected.
There have been nearly 7,500 confirmed infections worldwide, with officials saying the figure is likely to be much higher in reality.
Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia have been hardest hit.
Celebrations in West Africa for the Muslim festival of Eid al-Adha are being badly affected by the Ebola outbreak, with many public places deserted this weekend.
Earlier health officials said people arriving in the US from Ebola-affected countries in West Africa could be subject to extra screening at airports.
But the White House said on Monday it was not considering a ban on travellers from such countries, according to Reuters.
It comes as the US tries to limit the spread of its first confirmed case, a Liberian in Dallas. Thomas Duncan’s condition is critical but stable, Reuters quoted doctors in the state of Texas as saying on Monday.

Monday 6 October 2014

Fashion & Skin Cancer. ..... the truth


Rates of melanoma have been increasing for at least the past 30 years. Now, a new study published in the American Journal of Public Healthclaims a number of cultural and historical factors over the past 100 years, such as changes in fashion trends and social perceptions, have contributed to this increase.

Changes in clothing trends and melanoma
Researchers say changes in clothing over the past century have led us to show more skin, increasing UV exposure and the risk of melanoma.
Image credit: Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, NYU Langone Medical Center
Melanoma accounts for less than 2% of all skin cancercases but is the main cause of skin cancer deaths. This year, around 76,100 new cases of melanoma will be diagnosed in the US, and around 9,710 people will die from the disease.
A major cause of melanoma is high exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light from the sun or tanning lamps and beds. Earlier this year, Medical News Today reported on a study revealing multiple sunburns as an adolescent can increase the risk of melanoma by 80%.
In this latest study, led by Dr. David Polsky of NYU Langone Medical Center in New York, NY, the researchers have identified a number of factors in the past century that have led to increased exposure to UV light, which may explain rising melanoma incidence rates.
To reach their findings, Dr. Polsky and his team analyzed a number of socioeconomic changes from the early 1900s until now - such as evolution of clothing styles, economic trends, perceptions of tanned skin, social norms and travel patterns - and looked at how these may translate into increased UV exposure.
They divided the 20th century into four periods - the turn of the century, early 20th century, mid-20th century and late 20th century - and estimated the how much of the body was likely to have been exposed to UV light in each period.

The 'era of porcelain beauty' diminishes

The researchers describe the turn of the century as the "era of porcelain beauty." Lower class individuals were more likely to be tanned, as the majority worked outdoors doing manual labor, while upper class people were more likely to stay indoors. Therefore, having a tan was associated with lower status.
This, and the general negative attitudes toward dark-skinned individuals in this period, increased desirability for fair skin, the researchers say. As a result, many people shaded themselves from the sun with parasols and thick clothing that covered most of the body.
This began to change, however, when evidence emerged that exposure to sunlight may be good for general health, as well as illnesses such as tuberculosisand rickets.
Exposure to sunlight started to be perceived as positive, and as a result, people began spending more leisure time in the sun and wore clothing that showed more skin.

A reversal in negative attitudes toward tanned skin

In the early 20th century, the first evidence that UV exposure may cause skin cancer emerged. But the researchers say such warnings were largely ignored.
"This may have occurred because the mechanism underlying UV-induced carcinogenesis was poorly understood," the researchers note. "It was also widely held that sunlight caused skin cancer only in susceptible individuals, such as patients with xeroderma pigmentosum, but not in the general population."
Such warnings continued to be ignored in mid-20th century, when negative attitudes toward tanned skin completely reversed, the authors say.
Tanned skin was perceived as "sexy" and "healthy," and was promoted as such by celebrities and fashion magazines. As a result, clothing became more revealing. The T-shirt - which led to arm exposure on a daily basis - grew popular in 1942, and the bikini became popular in the US in the 1960s, increasing women's skin exposure from 47% to 80%.
The team also notes that increases in travel and engagement in outside sports would have led to increased UV exposure.

Tanned skin maintains its 'allure,' despite skin cancer warnings

Figures show that between the 1930s and 1960s, melanoma incidence increased 300% in men and 400% in women. The researchers say that this increase correlated with changes in fashion, travel and leisure that led to an increase in skin exposure.
"The tanning trend that began in the 1920s sustained its allure and celebrity promotion into the late 20th century," the researchers say. "Despite mounting evidence that UV exposure was linked to the development of skin cancer, tanned skin remained highly desirable."
And it seems perceptions have not changed in the 21st century. Tanned skin is still seen as being attractive and healthy, and as a result, many of us tend to ignore the warnings of skin cancer.
This is supported in a feature by MNT earlier this year, looking at why we ignore the health risks of UV exposure.
"Despite elevated awareness of the dangers of UV radiation, people still choose to ignore the dangers in the pursuit of what they consider to be a 'healthy tan,'" Tim Turnham, executive director of the Melanoma Research Foundation, told us.
"This is particularly an issue among young people who tend to ignore health risks in favor of enhancing their social status and popularity," he added. "We know that tanning appeals to people who are interested in being included, and this is a primary driver for teens - being part of the 'in' crowd."
Rates of melanoma are still on the rise in the US. Incidence increased from 22.8 cases per 100,000 to 28.9 cases per 100,000 between 2000 and 2009.
The investigators of this latest study note that although their research is unable to make a causal link to melanoma, it effectively provides a "historical framework" of how changing socioeconomic factors have contributed to the disease. They add:
"Identifying the roles of cultural and historical forces (including gender and social class differences) that contribute to the growth and persistence of public health problems may help target interventions to affect disease epidemiology in a positive fashion."

MNT recently reported on a study suggesting that askin glow from fruits and vegetables is deemed more attractive than a tan.

Peter Okoye talks about how his Bentley is used as police car in Dubai


Lol. So true. The kind of cars they even use as taxis in that country eh.... we will get to that stage soon *tongues out*

Almost the trend..Jide Kosoko’s Wife Henrietta Moves Out of Matrimonial Home!

Popular Nollywood celebrity couple, Jide and Henrietta Kosoko have started living apart. Sources say the couple, who have been married for years, recently started living separately when Henrietta moved out of their matrimonial home in Abule Egba. Some others claim their marriage has collapsed, but Henrietta insists she only moved out of her husband’s house because of polygamy pressures. ‘I am very much at peace with him’, she said. There are reports that the 60 year old actor has married a new wife

PHOTOS: South Africa seizes Nigeria's $5.7m in another secret arms deal bust


Three weeks after South African government seized $9.3million allegedly belonging to the Nigerian government, they have once again confiscated $5.7million arms money from Nigeria.

According to South African newspaper City Press, the money was seized by South Africa’s Asset Forfeiture Unit of the National Prosecuting Authority for allegedly being the proceeds of illegal transactions and even shared some documents. See the full report after the cut...

From City Press

The Asset Forfeiture Unit of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has seized $5.7 million (R64 million) for yet another arms deal between South Africa and Nigeria.
This is the second multimillion-rand arms deal between the two countries in the past month that has resulted in the money being frozen in South African banks.

Last month, R103 million in $100 bills stashed in suitcases was seized at Lanseria Airport, north of Joburg.

The money was frozen in both cases for allegedly being the proceeds of illegal transactions.
City Press’ sister paper Rapport has learnt that the department for offences against the state in the Special Investigating Unit is also involved.

Documents in the newspaper’s possession show that the earlier consignment was approved by the Nigerian government – that country’s national security adviser personally issued the end-user certificate for the transaction.

An entire “shopping list” was supplied with the certificate, which included everything from helicopters to unmanned aircraft, rockets and ammunition.
Sources close to the investigation said the latest transaction was between Cerberus Risk Solutions, an arms broker in Cape Town, and Societe D’Equipments Internationaux, a Nigerian company in Abuja.
An impeccable source said this company paid the R60 million into Cerberus’ account at Standard Bank.

Cerberus was previously registered as a broker with the National Conventional Arms Control Committee (NCACC), but the registration expired in May this year.
The marketing and contracting permits also expired at the same time.
The company has since applied for re-registration, but the application lay in the NCACC’s mailbox for more than two months.

Sources told Rapport that Cerberus apparently tried to pay the money back to the Nigerian company, after which the bank became suspicious.
The NPA’s Asset Forfeiture Unit subsequently obtained a court order in the South Gauteng High Court to seize the money.

Cerberus’ attorney, Martin Hood, this week declined to comment on the matter.
NPA spokesperson Nathi Mncube said there were no indications that the two transactions were related.
“However, both are now the subject of a criminal investigation and all possible information and connections are being investigated,” said Mncube.

Ebola: Lessons for US from Nigeria

Health workers attending to Ebola patients at a clinic in Monrovia, Liberia.... on Monday.
In the comity of West African nations affected by the Ebola Virus Disease, Nigeria and Cameroon have been singled out for their prompt response and effective contact tracing mechanism. Less than seven weeks after the late index case, Mr. Patrick Sawyer, imported the EVD into the Nigeria from Liberia, there is yet to be any suspected or confirmed case.
Stakeholders have said that the United States, which recorded its own index case on September 20, when a Liberian, Mr. Thomas Eric Duncan, travelled from Liberia the US, can take away a lesson or two from Nigeria’s quick response.
Minister of Health, Professor Onyebuchi Chukwu, said there were more than 800 primary and secondary contacts between Sawyer and the ECOWAS official, Olu Koye-Ibukun, who took the virus from Lagos to Port Harcourt. In the end, health workers reportedly made 18,500 face-to-face visits, checking on the contacts for any symptoms of the disease.
On September 10, Chukwu had announced a total number of 19 confirmed EVD cases with seven deaths.
In the US, the wheel of contact tracing has been set in motion and the number of primary and secondary contacts of Duncan whittled down to 15.
Reuters report on Sunday said, “While devastating reports continue to stream out of West Africa, where the deadly virus has overwhelmed already weak public health systems and left thousands of people dead, and anxiety grips the US over the first case of Ebola diagnosed in the country, one nation serves as an example of hope: Nigeria, which appears to have successfully contained Ebola.
“As concerns spread over US hospitals’ readiness, there are some lessons to be learned from Nigeria, where officials managed to get ahead of the fast-moving virus after it was brought into Africa’s most populous country by an Ebola-infected man, who had flown into Lagos. This week, the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention reported that the outbreak could be coming to an end in Nigeria, with no new Ebola cases since August 31.
“As in the US case, Ebola arrived in Nigeria by passenger plane. But unlike Thomas Eric Duncan, who arrived in Dallas before he became symptomatic and was therefore not contagious during his flights from Liberia to Texas through Brussels and Dulles International Airport, Patrick Sawyer was already symptomatic when he landed in Lagos on July 20. At that point, Sawyer, Nigeria’s index case was contagious and dying.”
It continued, “It was a nightmare scenario with the potential to spiral out of control, given the bustling city of Lagos, Africa’s largest, is a major transport hub. As Sawyer was placed in isolation, public health officials had to track down every single person who had come into contact with him, from the flights he had boarded to the Lagos airport and the private hospital where he went after landing. And they had to do so quickly, making the process known as contact tracing a priority.
“In the whole system approach in beating the war on Ebola, contact tracing is the key public health activity that needs to be done,” said Gavin MacGregor-Skinner, who helped with the Ebola response in Nigeria with the Elizabeth R. Griffin Research Foundation. “The key is to find all the people that patient had direct close contact with.”
“From that single patient came a list of 281 people, MacGregor-Skinner said. Every one of those individuals had to provide health authorities twice-a-day updates about their well-being, often through methods like text-messaging. Anyone who didn’t feel well or failed to respond was checked on, either through a neighbourhood network or health workers.
Nigeria took a “whole community approach,” with everyone from military officials to church elders in the same room, discussing how to handle the response to the virus, MacGregor-Skinner said.
“Such an approach, and contact tracing in general, requires people to be open and forthright about their movements and their health, he said. Stigmatisation of patients, their families and contacts could only discourage that, so Nigerian officials sent a message to “really make them look like heroes,” MacGregor-Skinner said.
“This is the best thing people can do for Nigeria: They are going to protect and save Nigeria by being honest, by doing what they need to do, by reporting to the health commission,” he said. This made people feel like they were a part of something extremely important, he said, and also took into account real community needs. “You got real engagement and compliance from the contacts. They’re not running and hiding.”
Sawyer had come into contact with someone who ended up in Port Harcourt. That person went to a doctor who ended up dying from Ebola in August. Within a week, 70 people were being monitored. It ballooned to an additional 400 people in that one city.
Success stories of people coming through strict Ebola surveillance alive and healthy helped encourage more people to come forward, as they recognised that ending up in a contact tracer’s sights did not mean a death sentence.
The CDC also pointed to the robust public health response by Nigerian officials, who have had experience with massive public health crises in the past — namely polio in 2012 and large-scale lead poisoning in 2010.
When someone is on a contact list, that does not mean that person has to stay at home for the entire incubation period of 21 days from the last contact with someone who had Ebola. People on contact lists are not under quarantine or in isolation. They can still go to work and go on with their lives. But they should take their temperature twice a day for 21 days and check in with health workers.
The CDC recommends that people without symptoms but who have had direct contact with the bodily fluids of a person sick with Ebola be put under either conditional release, meaning that they self-monitor their health and temperature and check in daily, or controlled movement. People under controlled movement have to notify officials about any intended travel and shouldn’t use commercial planes or trains. Local public transport at use is approved on a case-by-case basis.
When symptoms do develop, that’s when the response kicks into high gear. People with Ebola are contagious only once they begin exhibiting symptoms, which include fever, severe headaches and vomiting.
While four people in Dallas are under government-ordered quarantine, which is not the norm. Those individuals “were non-compliant with the request to stay home. I don’t want to go too far beyond that,” Dallas County Judge Clay Lewis Jenkins said Thursday.
On Friday, the four people were moved to a private residence from the apartment where Duncan had been staying when he became symptomatic.
A law enforcement officer will remain with them to enforce the order, and none of the people are allowed to leave until October 19.
Duncan is the only person with an Ebola diagnosis in Dallas, and no one else is showing symptoms at the moment. But, as Nigeria knows, the work in Dallas has just begun.

Sunday 5 October 2014

Arsenal & Chelsea... let's go back to the beginning and see how it all started

Once upon a time, Arsenal played Chelsea and, more often than not, beat them. But that was before the Roman empire swept into Stamford Bridge and altered the Premier League landscape.
Instead of the fixture that Gunners fans looked forward to the most, it has become the match they must secretly dread.
It was another Bridge – Wayne – who landed the first blow on behalf of owner Roman Abramovich and announced the arrival of a new order when he grabbed an 87th minute winner to clinch a 3-2 aggregate Champions League win at Highbury in March 2004.
Wayne Bridge scores against Arsenal for Chelsea at Highbury in the Champions League back in March 2004
Wayne Bridge scores against Arsenal for Chelsea at Highbury in the Champions League back in March 2004
The arrival of Jose Mourinho and Roman Abramovich marked an end to Arsenal's victories over Chelsea
The arrival of Jose Mourinho and Roman Abramovich marked an end to Arsenal's victories over Chelsea
Mourinho: Specialist in failure comments were a consequence
Things have never been quite the same, since. And Bridge’s goal was the turning point.
Emirates supporters look away now, as a reminder of the good old days brings home how fortunes have changed in the Premier League era.
Post Roman, the teams have played 28 times. Arsenal have won just six matches in all competitions, drawn seven and lost 15.
Contrast and compare that with 1992-2003, before the Russian billionaire turned Chelsea from fancy dans to title winners.
The teams faced each other 22 times. Arsenal lost only three, won 12 and drew seven and were the undisputed kings of the capital.
Arsenal players look dejected as Chelsea celebrate their 6-0 victory in March of this year
Arsenal players look dejected as Chelsea celebrate their 6-0 victory in March of this year
It all looked so rosy, in February 2004, when Arsene Wenger’s team knocked Chelsea out of the FA Cup and then beat them 2-1 at Stamford Bridge in what was then known as the Premiership.
Prick Vieira and Edu cancelled out Eidur Gudjohnsen’s early strike while the Icelander was also sent off in the second half.
One month later the rivals met in the Champions League. The first leg was drawn 1-1 and Arsenal were over-riding favourites. Jose Reyes gave the Gunners the lead on half-time only for Frank Lampard to level the scores before Bridge had the final say.
Arsenal fans could argue that it was not in the Premier League, which is what really counts over a season.
The same could be applied to the Community Shield in 2005 when a Didier Drogba double ensured a 2-1 Chelsea win.
Kieran Gibbs is mistakenly sent off following Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain's handball on the goal-line
Kieran Gibbs is mistakenly sent off following Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain's handball on the goal-line
But later that August, Arsenal could no longer claim to be so superior as Drogba scored the only goal in a 1-0 Premier League home victory.
The return was in December the same year. Arjen Robben and Joe Cole both found the net at Highbury and Chelsea had done the double over their North London neighbours.
As far as the neutral is concerned, however, this is a match which tends to throw up lots of goals, plenty of controversy and the enduring feud between Arsene Wenger and Jose Mourinho.
Arsenal fans will not need long memories to recall a rare fine moment – the 5-3 extravaganza in October 2011 when Robin van Persie scored twice in the last five minutes to complete his hat-trick after it looked as if Juan Mata had clinched a 3-3 draw.
Then again, they will not want reminding about what happened last season. Down to ten men (even if Kieran Gibbs was sent off instead of Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain) and on the end of a 6-0 thrashing.
Will the tide turn again on Sunday? The bookies suggest not.

Arsene Wenger: Record against Jose Mourinho counts for nothing